human breast epithelial cell line mcf10a (ATCC)
Structured Review
![Induction and characterization of EMT and MET in breast cancer cell lines. (A) Immunoblot analysis of EMT induction in MCF7 cells transiently overexpressing TWIST1-GFP for 48 h. Cells were transfected with 2 μg of pEGFPN1 or hTWIST1-GFP (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of EMT in MCF7 cells overexpressing TWIST1-GFP or control pEGFPN1. E-cadherin and Vimentin (red), nucleus (DAPI, blue). Scale bar ∼10 μm (C) Schematic representation of EMT induction in MCF7 cells (D) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MCF7 cells. Quantification for panel (B) ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) from N = 3 independent biological replicates. (E) Immunoblot analysis of EMT induction in <t>MCF10A</t> cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF-β for 7 days (F) Immunofluorescence analysis of EMT in MCF10A cells treated with TGF-β. E-cadherin (green); Vimentin (red); nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm (G) Schematic representation of EMT induction in MCF10A cells (H) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MCF10A cells [data shown in panel (F)] following EMT induction ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± SD from N = 3 independent biological replicates (I) Immunoblot analysis of MET induction in MDAMB231 cells following doxycycline-induced GRHL2 overexpression for 48 h (J) Immunofluorescence analysis of MET in MDAMB231 cells overexpressing GRHL2. E-cadherin and Vimentin (red), nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm (K) Schematic representation of MET induction in MDAMB231 cells (L) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MDAMB231 cells following MET induction [data shown in panel (J)] ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates. Unpaired Student’s t -test was used to compute the P -value.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_4643/pmc12774643/pmc12774643__gkaf1464fig1.jpg)
Human Breast Epithelial Cell Line Mcf10a, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 8319 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human breast epithelial cell line mcf10a/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 8319 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Phosphorylation-dependent modulation of the Lamin A/C–EZH2 complex regulates epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity"
Article Title: Phosphorylation-dependent modulation of the Lamin A/C–EZH2 complex regulates epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity
Journal: Nucleic Acids Research
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf1464
Figure Legend Snippet: Induction and characterization of EMT and MET in breast cancer cell lines. (A) Immunoblot analysis of EMT induction in MCF7 cells transiently overexpressing TWIST1-GFP for 48 h. Cells were transfected with 2 μg of pEGFPN1 or hTWIST1-GFP (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of EMT in MCF7 cells overexpressing TWIST1-GFP or control pEGFPN1. E-cadherin and Vimentin (red), nucleus (DAPI, blue). Scale bar ∼10 μm (C) Schematic representation of EMT induction in MCF7 cells (D) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MCF7 cells. Quantification for panel (B) ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) from N = 3 independent biological replicates. (E) Immunoblot analysis of EMT induction in MCF10A cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF-β for 7 days (F) Immunofluorescence analysis of EMT in MCF10A cells treated with TGF-β. E-cadherin (green); Vimentin (red); nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm (G) Schematic representation of EMT induction in MCF10A cells (H) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MCF10A cells [data shown in panel (F)] following EMT induction ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± SD from N = 3 independent biological replicates (I) Immunoblot analysis of MET induction in MDAMB231 cells following doxycycline-induced GRHL2 overexpression for 48 h (J) Immunofluorescence analysis of MET in MDAMB231 cells overexpressing GRHL2. E-cadherin and Vimentin (red), nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm (K) Schematic representation of MET induction in MDAMB231 cells (L) Scatter plot of immunofluorescence assay, showing relative changes in the integrated density of E-cadherin and Vimentin in MDAMB231 cells following MET induction [data shown in panel (J)] ( n = 200). Data represent mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates. Unpaired Student’s t -test was used to compute the P -value.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, Control, Standard Deviation, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Impact of EMT induction on Lamin A/C expression. (A, D, G) Immunofluorescence analysis of Lamin A/C (red) in MCF7 (A) , MCF10A (D) , and MDAMB231 (G) cells upon EMT (A, D) or MET (G) nucleus (DAPI, blue). Scale bar ∼10 μm. (B, E, H) Mean fluorescence intensity of Lamin A/C quantified by line scan analysis across the nucleus in MCF7 (B) , MCF10A (E) , and MDAMB231 (H) cells. Data represent mean ± SD from N = 3 independent biological replicates ( n = 250). Unpaired Student’s t -test was used to calculate P -values. (C, F, I) Immunoblot analysis of total Lamin A/C protein levels in MCF7 (C) , MCF10A (F) , and MDAMB231 (I) cells upon EMT (C, F) or MET (I) induction. GAPDH (C, F) and HSP70 (I) are loading controls. (J) Immunoblot analysis of Lamin A/C, Lamin B1, and Lamin B2 levels across 11 cell lines of breast origin with increasing mesenchymal characteristics. Loading control: Histone H3 (K) RT-qPCR analysis of LMNA transcript levels in MCF7 and MCF10A upon EMT and MET in MDAMB231 cells. Data represent mean ± SD ( N = 3, n = 9). Unpaired Student’s t -test was used to compute the P -values. Means are compared between (B) −Twist1 (control) and +Twist1; (E) −TGFβ (control) and (H) +TGFβ; −GRHL2 (control) and +GRHL2, statistical significance, P -value <0.05.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of Lamin A/C perturbation on EMT and MET. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in MCF10A cells upon Lamin A/C knockdown. Downregulated, upregulated, and nonsignificant genes. (B) Heatmap of the top 50 [ P <0.05; log 2 Fold Change (FC) > 2] differentially expressed genes in MCF10A cells upon Lamin A/C knockdown. Downregulated and upregulated genes, respectively ( N = 2 biological replicates). (C) GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes ( P ≤0.05), showing the most enriched biological processes. (D) GSEA plot showing enrichment for EMT upon Lamin A/C knockdown (normalized enrichment score = 3.337). (E, F) Immunofluorescence analysis of MCF7 (E) and MCF10A (F) cells upon Lamin A/C knockdown. Lamin A/C, E-cadherin or Vimentin, and phalloidin. Nucleus (DAPI). Scale bars, ∼10 μm (G) Immunofluorescence analysis of MDAMB231 cells overexpressing Lamin A*-GFP upon endogenous Lamin A/C depletion. E-cadherin (top panel) or Vimentin (bottom panel), and Lamin A/C (−Dox and +Dox panels only). Nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. ( H–J ) Immunoblot analysis of EMT markers in MCF7 (H) , MCF10A (I) cells upon Lamin A/C knockdown, and MDAMB231 (J) cells upon Lamin A overexpression. RNA-Seq was performed in N = 2 independent biological replicates. Lamin A* denotes a full-length Lamin A construct resistant to doxycycline-induced depletion of endogenous Lamin A/C. Statistical significance, P -value <0.05.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Immunofluorescence, Western Blot, Over Expression, RNA Sequencing, Construct
Figure Legend Snippet: Dynamic Remodeling of the Lamin A/C Interactome During EMT and MET. (A, B) Venn diagrams showing unique and common interactors of Lamin A/C identified by (Immunoprecipitation - Mass Spectroscopy) IP-MS in MCF7 versus MCF7-TWIST1 (A) and MDAMB231 versus MDAMB231-GRHL2 (B). (C, D) Representative STRING network analysis of Lamin A/C interactors in MCF7 versus MCF7-TWIST1 (C) and MDAMB231 versus MDAMB231-GRHL2 (D) . ( E–G ) Co-IP of Lamin A/C in MCF7 (E) , MCF10A (F) , and MDAMB231 (G) cells upon EMT (E, F) or MET (G) induction, followed by immunoblotting for EZH2 and Lamin A/C. IgG: isotype control, an approximately equal amount of antibody is used for immunoprecipitation. (H, I) Proximity ligation assay (PLA) detects Lamin A/C–EZH2 interaction in MCF7 (H) and MDAMB231 (I) cells upon EMT (H) or MET (I) induction. PLA signal (red), nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar: ∼10 μm. (J, K) Quantification of PLA signal in MCF7 (J) and MDAMB231 (K) cells. Data represent mean ± SD from N = 3, independent biological replicates, and P -values calculated by one-way ANOVA and means are compared between pBp-EV and pBP-Twist (J) and −Dox (GRHL2) and +Dox (GRHL2) (K). (L) Time-course analysis of Lamin A/C–EZH2 interaction by immunoprecipitation of Lamin A/C in MCF10A cells during EMT progression [∼12 to ∼168 h (∼7 days) post-TGF-β treatment] and MET recovery [5 days post-TGF-β withdrawal (WD)], assessed by Co-IP and immunoblotting. IgG: isotype control, statistical significance, P -value <0.05.
Techniques Used: Immunoprecipitation, Mass Spectrometry, Protein-Protein interactions, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot, Control, Proximity Ligation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: CDK1-mediated phosphorylation regulates Lamin A/C–EZH2 interaction and EMT progression. (A) Co-IP of FLAG in HEK293T cells co-transfected with full-length EZH2-FLAG and Lamin A-GFP deletion mutants (ΔHead 1–29, ΔRod 31–387, ΔIgG 428–549, ΔTail 550–664 of Lamin A). (B) Co-IP of GFP in HEK293T cells co-transfected with full-length Lamin A-GFP and EZH2-FLAG deletion mutants (Δ1–300, Δ301–500, Δ501–746 of EZH2). (C) PLA detects Lamin A/C–pCDK1(T161) interaction in MCF10A cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF-β for ∼7 days. Nucleus (DAPI), PLA signal in red. Scale bar ∼10 μm (D) PLA detects Lamin A/C– EZH2 interaction in MCF10A cells treated with DMSO or 10 μM RO3306 for ∼18 h in the ± TGF-β for ∼7 days, nucleus (DAPI). PLA signal in red. Scale bar ∼10 μm. (E) Schematic representation of RO3306 and MG132 treatment in MCF7 cells (F) Quantification of PLA foci/nucleus of the data in (C) . P -values were calculated using ANOVA. Means are compared between +TGFβ and –TGFβ (control) conditions with the single antibody control. (G) Quantification of PLA foci/nucleus of the data in (D) . Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t -tests. Means are compared between +TGFβ and –TGFβ (control) conditions within each group (DMSO and RO-3306). (H) Immunofluorescence of MCF7 cells transiently transfected with pEGFP-N1 or Twist1-GFP and treated with 10 μM RO3306 for 18 h. nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm (I) Immunofluorescence and quantification of colocalized voxels and Mander’s coefficient for Lamin A/C and EZH2 in MCF10A cells ± TGF-β and 1 μM MG132. Nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t -tests. Means are compared between +TGFβ and –TGFβ (control) conditions within each treatment group (DMSO and RO-3306). (J) Immunofluorescence of MCF7 cells treated with MG132 and transient overexpression of hTWIST1-GFP and stained for E-cadherin and Vimentin ; nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. (K) Immunoblotting for EMT markers in MCF7 treated with RO3306 and Twist1-GFP in MCF7 (L) Immunoblotting for EMT markers in MCF7 cells treated with MG132 and Twist1-GFP in MCF7. For all experiments, data are represented as mean ± SD from N = 3 three independent biological replicates, statistical significance, P -value <0.05.
Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Control, Immunofluorescence, Over Expression, Staining, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of Lamin A/C–EZH2 binding in EMT and MET. (A, B) Schematic representation of the workflow for generating stable cell lines with inducible knockdown of Lamin A (A) or EZH2 (B) , followed by rescue with full-length, phosphodeficient, or phosphomimetic mutants. (C, D) Co-IP of Lamin A in MCF7 and MDAMB231 cells after doxycycline-induced Lamin A/C depletion and rescue with full-length, phosphodeficient (S22A), or phosphomimetic (S22D) Lamin A. TWIST1-GFP was transiently overexpressed in MCF7 cells, and GRHL2-GFP was stably overexpressed in MDAMB231 cells. (E, F) Coimmunoprecipitation of EZH2 in MCF7 and MDAMB231 cells after doxycycline-induced EZH2 depletion and rescue with full-length, phosphodeficient (T345A), or phosphomimetic (T345D) EZH2. TWIST1-GFP was transiently overexpressed in MCF7 cells, and GRHL2-GFP was stably overexpressed in MDAMB231 cells. (G) Immunofluorescence images of MCF10A cells showing the extent of colocalization between Lamin A [full-length, phosphodeficient (S22A), or phosphomimetic (S22D)] and EZH2 ± TGF-β. Nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. (H) Immunofluorescence images of MCF10A cells showing the extent of colocalization between EZH2 [full-length, phosphodeficient (T345A), or phosphomimetic (T345D)] nucleus (DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. (I, J) Quantification of Lamin A and EZH2 colocalization in MCF10A cells using Mander’s coefficient. Unpaired Student’s t -test was used to compute the P -value. Means are compared between (I) LMNA-GFP (UT; control) versus LMNA-S22D (UT) and LMNA-GFP (TGFβ; control) versus LMNA-S22D (TGFβ). (J) EZH2-FLAG (UT; control) versus EZH2-T345D (UT) and EZH2-FLAG (TGFβ; control) versus EZH2-T345D (TGFβ). Statistical significance, P -value <0.05.
Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Binding Assay, Stable Transfection, Knockdown, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of EZH2 and Lamin A/C during EMT and MET. Representative mid-optical sections of immunofluorescence images showing the effect of Lamin A and EZH2 mutants on EMT (in MCF10A) and MET (in MDAMB231). MCF10A (A, C) and MDAMB231 (B, D) . Cells were transduced with full-length, phospho-deficient, or phospho-mimetic constructs of Lamin A (A, B) or EZH2 (C, D) following doxycycline-induced knockdown (0.5 μg/ml, 48 h) of endogenous Lamin A/C or EZH2. EMT was induced in MCF10A cells by TGF-β treatment (10 ng/ml, ∼7 days), while MET was induced in MDAMB231 cells by stable, constitutive overexpression of GRHL2. EZH2 was immunostained in green; E-cadherin and Vimentin were immunostained in red. Lamin A constructs were GFP-tagged. Nucleus (blue, DAPI). Scale bar ∼10 μm. (E, F) Immunoblot analysis of EMT marker expression in MCF7 and MCF10A cells upon Lamin A/C knockdown and rescue with full-length, phospho-deficient (S22A), or phospho-mimetic (S22D) Lamin A-GFP. EMT was induced by TWIST1 overexpression (∼48 h) in MCF7 cells or by 10ng/ml TGF-β (∼7 days) in MCF10A cells. (G) EM marker expression in cells with Lamin A/C knockdown was rescued with full-length, phospho-deficient (S22A) or phospho-mimetic (S22D) Lamin A/C. MET was induced by GRHL2 overexpression. (H, I) Immunoblot analysis of EMT marker expression in MCF7 and MCF10A cells upon EZH2 knockdown and rescue with full-length, phospho-deficient (T345A), or phospho-mimetic (T345D) EZH2-FLAG. EMT was induced by TGF-β (∼7 days) in MCF10A cells or by TWIST1 overexpression (∼48 h) in MCF7 cells. (J) EM marker expression in cells with EZH2 knockdown rescued with full-length, phospho-deficient (T345A), or phospho-mimetic (T345D) EZH2. MET was induced by GRHL2 overexpression.
Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Immunofluorescence, Transduction, Construct, Knockdown, Over Expression, Western Blot, Marker, Expressing
